Perspective

What is Structured Credit?

Structured Credit includes non-traditional bonds securitized by specific pools of collateral, such as residential and commercial mortgages, consumer loans or commercial loans. Figure 1 summarizes the major sectors. Through a process called securitization, loans with similar characteristics are purchased and pooled in a trust-like entity known as a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV). The SPV then issues securities backed by the principal and interest cash flows of the collateral pool that exhibit a variety of characteristics in terms of coupon, maturity, price, yield and credit quality.

Figure 1: MAJOR STRUCTURED CREDIT SECTORS

Key Features and Potential Benefits of Structured Credit

Structured Credit can benefit investors in a number of ways, including the potential for relatively high risk-adjusted returns, attractive monthly income, portfolio diversification, and limited exposure to duration and credit risk.

Non-Indexed and Inefficient: Because non-agency structured credit exists outside of major indexes, it may provide investors access to fixed income market segments that have not been commoditized by major benchmarks and ETFs. In addition, the inefficient and complex nature of the space allows for highly experienced managers to exploit price dislocations.

Floating Rate: Many structured credit products offer a “floating” or variable rate. Similar to more commonly known bank loans, the coupon offered is typically a spread above a benchmark rate, such as LIBOR. This can be particularly appealing when interest rates are rising.

Risk-Adjusted Yield Premium: Structured Credit typically offers investors attractive yield per unit of duration relative to traditional fixed income. (See Figure 2)

Tranched Risk: While the collateral is made up of pools of loans with similar characteristics, Structured Credit securities are typically tranched into a capital structure through a process known as subordination (See Figure 3). Each tranche is offered separately, and each has a distinct risk/return profile. The more senior tranches typically have less exposure to credit risk and, as a result, have lower yields. Conversely, the more junior the tranche, generally the higher the levels of credit risk and yield. (See Figure 3) This allows investors a broad spectrum of options to satisfy their risk/reward preferences.

Credit Enhancement: In addition to subordination described above, structured credit may offer another advantage over traditional fixed income: credit enhancement, through overcollateralization and excess spread. This can help mitigate credit risk and can provide a buffer against loss.

Diversification: Structured credit potentially offers diversification at both the loan and the portfolio level. At the loan level, structured credit securities are typically collateralized by a diverse pool of similar assets such as loans. This diversifies the collateral pool, reducing idiosyncratic credit risk of all tranches in the deal. At the portfolio level, investors can gain exposure to a part of the fixed income market that exists outside major indexes and ETFs. In addition, structured credit has historically had low correlation among its sub-sectors as well as to traditional fixed income sectors.

Figure 2: Structured Credit Sectors Provide More Yield Per Unit of Duration 

Source: Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan, Orange Investment Advisors. As of 2/14/2024. Information shown are daily yield-to-maturity (YTM) and duration

Blue bars represent structured credit sectors and gray bars represent traditional fixed income categories.

CLO is represented by BBB CLO Index

RMBS Index is represented by JPM Non-QM 2020 BBB

ABS is represented by JPM ABS Auto Subprime Auto Senior Index

CMBS Index is represented by JPM Conduit 2016 Single-A

Treasuries, IG & HY Corporates, Mortgage, Municipals and Aggregate are represented by the Bloomberg Indices.

Yield per unit of duration is the fund’s/index yield to maturity divided by the fund’s/index duration.

Key Risks to Investing in Structured Credit

Every investment comes with risks. In fixed income, typical risks include interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and prepayment risk. Risks specific to structured credit include:

Interest rate risk: Rapid and dramatic shifts in interest rates may affect the value of a structured credit bond. Rate movements may also indirectly affect pre-payment or extension risk, which are essentially the risks of a callable bond being called sooner or later than projected by the investor.

Credit risk: Unlike an Agency bond that is backed by the U.S. Government, credit risk cannot be totally eliminated within non-agency structured credit, particularly in lower-rated, subordinate bonds.

Liquidity risk: Structured credit products may trade less frequently than other fixed-income products, making them somewhat less liquid. This is directly related to the fact that they are non-index, which is also the source of market inefficiency. This risk can normally be effectively managed by experienced Structured Credit traders, but nonetheless will increase at times of heightened market volatility.

Complexity risk: While pooling multiple loans helps to diversify idiosyncratic credit risk, the Structured Credit market is complex and diverse, made up of a variety of deal structures and collateral types that require specialized expertise and resources.

FIGURE 3: CAPITAL STRUCTURE RESULTING FROM SUBORDINATION
Senior Tranches	▪ Seek to have higher ratings; investment grade ▪ Last in capital structure to incur losses ▪ Receive principal payments first ▪ Lowest yield in capital structure
Mezzanine Tranches	▪ Subordinate to senior tranches ▪ Typically investment grade; can be slightly below ▪ Absorb losses only after junior tranches are written off ▪ Receive principal sequentially after seniors ▪ Yields between senior and junior tranches
Junior Tranches	▪ Subordinate to mezzanine tranches ▪ Unrated or below investment grade ratings ▪ First in capital structure to incur losses ▪ Last in capital structure to receive principal ▪ Highest yield in capital structure

Evolution of Structured Credit

Since the global financial crisis, the structured credit market has undergone significant changes and enhancements. Numerous regulatory changes, including the Dodd-Frank Act and the Volker Rule within the United States and Basil III globally, have resulted in tighter lending standards, increased disclosure and reporting, greater risk retention by originators and increased capital requirements. These changes have led to increased oversight and protections for investors as well as reduced abuses by originators. Below are several key examples of types of credit enhancements and safeguards offered within structured credit.

The Case for Structured Credit in an Uncertain Interest Rate Environment

After suffering through one of the worst years in history in 2022 and a volatile 2023, bonds are poised to perform well given attractive yield profiles across most fixed income sectors in 2024. Given the favorable background, investors are the most bullish on bonds since the Global Financial Crisis amid strong conviction that rates will move lower in 2024, high current income, and concerns about lofty equity valuations. Record flows into fixed income and new issue subscription levels highlight insatiable demand for fixed income.

Structured credit continues to offer the most relative value amongst fixed-income sectors based on 10-year spread percentiles.

The regime of steady, low interest rates is over, and interest rate volatility is likely to persist for the foreseeable future. The current volatile interest rate environment is yet another example of how difficult it is to predict and market-time interest rates. Therefore, a fixed income strategy that generates attractive returns without taking unnecessary interest rate risk may lead to higher risk-adjusted returns.

Within fixed income, it is important to focus on strategies that maximize yield while minimizing duration to remove interest rate risk while retaining income. As highlighted in the chart above, structured credit is positioned to achieve these aims, with yields per unit of interest rate risk being the highest in almost 20 years. We believe that, as demand materializes, structured credit spreads will most likely tighten resulting in capital appreciation on top of higher yields.

Structured credit sectors may potentially offer higher risk-adjusted returns and opportunities for alpha because they are not indexed and are therefore priced more inefficiently than traditional indexed fixed income sectors. A bottom-up, active, value-based security selection strategy is the ideal approach to capture these market inefficiencies and excess returns available in Structured Credit.

Structured Credit vs Corporates

Going into a recession, fundamental credit risk may be harder to quantify in corporate credit sectors such as IG Corporates, High Yield and Levered Loans than in Structured credit sectors such as RMBS, CMBS, ABS and CLOs. Today’s structured credit bonds bear little resemblance to those that played a role during the Global Financial Crisis. In fact, we believe structured credit offers safer credit risk than comparably rated corporate credit because of diversification, credit enhancement, and structural protections. For instance, structured credit bonds benefit from “self-correcting” mechanisms such as excess spread, senior/subordinate tranches, interest diversion mechanisms, over-collateralization, and interest coverage tests. Meanwhile, corporate bonds have never been more levered and exposed to idiosyncratic risks. Structured credit often also benefits from a maturity that matches the maturity of the underlying pool of collateral assets, a structural requirement known as “self-amortization” or being “maturity matched.” In contrast, a corporation typically must find cash from its balance sheet or tap the equity/debt markets to refinance its existing debt when it matures.

Furthermore, structured credit bonds benefit from securitization, a process of pooling financial assets in a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV). These SPVs do not have ongoing operations, employees, property, plants, or equipment. They are not exposed to changes in personnel, operational mistakes, or poor management. Structured credit bonds hold assets that serve as collateral and hence benefit from the secured nature of the cashflows earned from the asset portfolio that are used to pay both interest and principal vs. corporate debt which is typically unsecured and includes only a “promise to pay” from the corporate entity. SPVs are also “bankruptcy remote,” or isolated from the credit performance of the corporate sponsor that set up the securitization. For example, Hertz’s fleet-lease structured credit bonds did not take a loss when Hertz declared bankruptcy during COVID-19. That is because each auto loan borrower was still required to pay their monthly payment, and the collection of these payments served as the cashflow used to pay interest and principal on the debt.

Figure 4: Comparison of Bond Category Performance
Morningstar Category	YTM	Avg. Price	Avg. Duration	1-Year Returns	SI Returns*
JSVIX	8.50%	$78.16	2.66	5.08%	5.11%
Bank Loan	9.37%	-	0.25	3.94%	3.58%
High Yield Bond	7.36%	$97.04	2.96	3.57%	3.35%
Intermediate Core Plus Bond	5.42%	$94.28	6.11	1.19%	1.41%
Intermediate Core Bond	4.84%	$93.44	6.00	0.68%	0.93%
Multisector Bond	6.55%	$93.11	4.25	2.34%	2.31%
Nontraditional Bond	6.17%	$94.64	2.89	2.00%	1.88%
Short-Term Bond	4.89%	$99.30	2.70	1.66%	1.75%

All data as of 12/31/2023 unless otherwise noted.

*Annualized returns since 8/21/2018, the inception of JSVIX

In the table above, we illustrate the low and even negative total returns generated by high duration and/or low yield strategies over the course of 5-years during which there were multiple different interest rate environments—declining/sideways during 2019-2021, rising/volatile during 2022-2023.

Higher yielding, shorter duration strategies in inefficient markets such as Structured Credit reduce exposure to unpredictable, external market factors such as interest rate risk while providing the opportunity to generate alpha from security selection, allowing higher skilled managers to outperform.

There is no guarantee that an investor would experience these results going forward, but it points to the potentially attractive features of structured credit, particularly in today’s environment of rising interest rates.

Conclusions: A Niche Where Expertise Matters

Overall, we see structured credit as an important piece of a properly diversified portfolio. By including exposure to structured credit within their diversified bond portfolios, investors can potentially increase their overall risk-adjusted yield while including an asset class with low correlations to other market sectors. And in a period of rising rates, structured credit’s risk/return profile can be even more attractive.

Because structured credit is a specialized part of the fixed income market, investors may benefit most from working with an experienced manager who can understand, identify and unlock the value that this may offer market offers. 

To learn more about structured credit and how you could potentially enjoy its numerous potential benefits, contact us at info@easterlyfunds.com or call (888) 814-8180. 

Performance as of 12/31/2023

	QTD	YTD	1-Year	3-Year	5-Year	Since Inception (8/21/2018)
JSVIX (I Shares)	2.66%	5.91%	5.91%	1.33%	4.95%	4.93%
Morningstar Multisector Bond Category	5.68%	8.13%	8.13%	0.10%	2.93%	2.27%
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index	6.82%	5.53%	5.53%	-3.32%	1.10%	1.21%

Performance data quoted is historical.

The performance data shown represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. Investment returns and principal value will fluctuate, so that investors’ shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. See performance data current to the most recent quarter end, which may be higher or lower than that cited. Performance figures assume that all distributions are reinvested. Performance shown is for the share class indicated only. The performance of other share classes will vary. For performance information current to the most recent month-end, please call 888.814.8180.

Inception date was August 21, 2018. Returns for the fund’s first year are since fund inception.

All returns are quoted as annualized if over 1 year. Returns for the fund’s first year are since fund inception. Calendar year returns do not reflect the maximum sales charge; otherwise, returns would vary.

The Fund’s management has contractually waived a portion of its management fees until March 31, 2024 for I, A, C and R6 Shares. The performance shown reflects the waivers without which the performance would have been lower. Total annual operating expenses before the expense reduction/reimbursement are 1.61%, 1.86%, 2.61%, and 1.61%, respectively; total annual operating expenses after the expense reduction/reimbursement are 1.55%, 1.80%, 2.55%, and 0.96%, respectively. 2.00% is the maximum sales charge on purchases of A Shares.

The Fund’s investment adviser has contractually agreed to reduce and/or absorb expenses until at least March 31, 2024 for I, A, C and R6 Shares, to ensure that net annual operating expenses of the fund (excluding front-end and contingent deferred sales loads, leverage, interest and tax expenses, dividends and interest on short positions, brokerage commissions, expenses incurred in connection with any merger, reorganization or liquidation, extraordinary or non-routine expenses and the indirect costs of investing in other investment companies) will not exceed 1.48%, 1.73%, 2.48%, and 0.89%, respectively, subject to possible recoupment from the Fund in future years. For more information, please refer to the Fund’s summary prospectus and prospectus.

Glossary

Average Duration: Average duration is generated by Morningstar from the categories funds by weighting the effective duration of each fund’ portfolio by its relative size in the category. 

Average Price: Average price is generated by Morningstar from the categories funds by weighting the average price of each fund’s portfolio by its relative size in the category. 

Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index: A broad bond index covering most U.S. traded bonds and some foreign bonds traded in the U.S. The Index consists of approximately 17,000 bonds. 

Effective Duration: This measure of duration takes into account the fact that expected cash flows will fluctuate as interest rates change and is, therefore, a measure of risk. Effective duration can be estimated using modified duration if a bond with embedded options behaves like an option-free bond. 

Morningstar Bank Loan Category: Bank loan portfolios primarily invest in floating-rate bank loans instead of bonds. 

Morningstar High-Yield Bond Category: High-yield bond portfolios concentrate on lower-quality bonds, which are riskier than those of higher-quality companies. 

Morningstar Intermediate Core Bond Category: Intermediate-term core bond portfolios invest primarily in investment-grade U.S. fixed-income issues including government, corporate, and securitized debt, and hold less than 5% in below-investment-grade exposures. Their durations (a measure of interest-rate sensitivity) typically range between 75% and 125% of the three-year average of the effective duration of the Morningstar Core Bond Index. 

Morningstar Intermediate Core-Plus Bond Category: Intermediate-term core-plus bond portfolios invest primarily in investment-grade U.S. fixed-income issues including government, corporate, and securitized debt, but generally have greater flexibility than core offerings to hold non-core sectors such as corporate high yield, bank loan, emerging-markets debt, and non-U.S. currency exposures. Their durations (a measure of interest-rate sensitivity) typically range between 75% and 125% of the three-year average of the effective duration of the Morningstar Core Bond Index. 

Morningstar Multisector Bond Category: Multisector-bond portfolios seek income by diversifying their assets among several fixed income sectors, usually U.S. government obligations, U.S. corporate bonds, foreign bonds, and high-yield U.S. debt securities. 

Morningstar Nontraditional Bond Category: The Nontraditional Bond category contains funds that pursue strategies divergent in one or more ways from conventional practice in the broader bond-fund universe. 

Morningstar Short-Term Bond Category: Short-term bond portfolios invest primarily in corporate and other investment-grade U.S. fixed-income issues and typically have durations of 1.0 to 3.5 years. 

Spread Duration: The sensitivity of the price of a security to changes in its credit spread. The credit spread is the difference between the yield of a security and the yield of a benchmark rate, such as a cash interest rate or government bond yield. 

Yield per unit of duration: Is the funds yield to maturity divided by the fund’s duration. 

YTM: Yield to Maturity (YTM) is the total return anticipated on a bond if the bond is held until it matures. Yield to maturity is considered a long-term bond yield but is expressed as an annual rate. 

Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund. This and other information is contained in the Fund’s prospectus, which can be obtained by calling 888-814-8180 and should be read carefully before investing. Additional Fund literature may be obtained by visiting www.EasterlyFunds.com. 

Important Fund Risks

There is no assurance that the portfolio will achieve its investment objective. A CLO is a trust typically collateralized by a pool of loans. A CBO is a trust which is often backed by a diversified pool of high risk, below investment grade fixed income securities. A CDO is a trust backed by other types of assets representing obligations of various parties. For CLOs, CBOs and other CDOs, the cash flows from the trust are split into two or more portions, called tranches. MBS and ABS have different risk characteristics than traditional debt securities. Although certain principals of the Sub-Adviser have managed U.S. registered mutual funds, the Sub-Adviser has not previously managed a U.S. registered mutual fund and has only recently registered as an investment adviser with the SEC.

Easterly Funds, LLC and Easterly Investment Partners, LLC both serve as the Advisors to the Easterly Fund family of mutual funds and related portfolios. Both Easterly Funds, LLC and Easterly Investment Partners, LLC are registered as investment advisers with the SEC. . Effective 10/2/2023, the Easterly mutual funds are distributed by Easterly Securities, LLC. Although Easterly Funds, LLC and Easterly Investment Partners, LLC are registered investment advisers, registration itself does not imply and should not be interpreted to imply any particular level of skill or training.

THE OPINIONS STATED HEREIN ARE THAT OF THE AUTHOR AND ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE COMPANY. NOTHING WRITTEN IN THIS COMMENTARY OR WHITE PAPER SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS FACT, PREDICTION OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE OR RESULTS, OR A SOLICITATION TO INVEST IN ANY SECURITY.

Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.

20240304-3419296